Semantic Interoperability for the Internet of Things
Proof of the consolidation is the closer cooperation and interoperation between Alliances and Standards bodies in the IoT space.
One could say that there is not much of a discussion anymore at the Network layer - the Internet Protocol (IP) rules there, already supporting constrained devices via many networking technologies, such as 6LowPAN. IP is being extended to other traditionally non-IP standards like ZigBee or Bluetooth as well.
At layers above Network, there are not that many protocols either. They generally run over UDP, TCP and/or SMS. If we were to make a distinction we could see REST-based ones like Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) and HTTP or more broker-based ones like MQTT or XMPP. Additional functionality has been built on top of these basic communication mechanisms, for instance at the IETF with the definition of a Broker-like system for publish/subscribe type of communication, Resource Directory , Web Linking for Constrained Devices or the CoAP Interfaces that have become part of several other standards.
Vendors working on the IoT space are traditionally building vertically integrated systems with these protocols as building blocks. On top of those systems they add their own application semantics, interfaces and proprietary solutions. This situation makes it more complicated for multiple of these systems to integrate or interoperate with each other, even if they use extremely similar protocol stacks.
To fix this problem, several organizations are launching various standardization efforts in this area. Some examples include the work by the OMA LWM2M and their management objects, IPSO and their Starter and Expansion Packs, the Cluster Library developed by the Zigbee Alliance , the Thing Description work of W3C or the UPnP Management and Control:1 specifications.Other noteworthy efforts include the ontology work in ETSI SmartM2M and also the European research community in IERC and the Activity Chain on semantic interoperability that published a position paper on the topic.
Link to the European research community. (IERC)
Many of these models would not currently work together due to small differences in serialization or small design choices made along the way. The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) has previously held workshops with similar harmonization targets on different topics (e.g. pervasive monitoring, Internet middleboxes, bringing constrained devices to the Internet...).
Next March, the IAB will hold a Semantic Interoperability Workshop, in order to discuss the state of the art in data and information models, the different schemas, the role of metadata, different interworking experiences and there is even room for harmonizing the various models.
Ericsson will be there as venue host - in San Jose, California - and Ericsson researchers will participate as experts from some of the participating organisations as well as members of the program committee, trying to make a future in which devices truly interoperate.
If you are interested and work in the area, you just have to submit a brief position paper (3 pages) of your work and opinions to the questions on the workshop per email to firstname.lastname@example.org and check the website https://www.iab.org/.
See you there!
Oct 05, 2018 |Research paper
Making Constrained Things Reachable: A Secure IP-Agnostic NAT Traversal Approach for IoT
Jul 23, 2020 |Blog post
What is semantic interoperability in IoT and why is it important?
Industry 4.0, IoT, Research
Jul 06, 2021 |Research paper
Formal Analysis of EDHOC Key Establishment for Constrained IoT Devices
Security, IoT, Research
Like what you’re reading? Please sign up for email updates on your favorite topics.Subscribe now
At the Ericsson Blog, we provide insight to make complex ideas on technology, innovation and business simple.